Monday, January 12, 2009


Prince Harry... an ALLY... who was fighting with us... used some manly language in the field... and even used bad words to describe the enemy. Hmmmmm. I guess we can try to kill them.... but not call them names. It's WAR. I'm pretty sure the Vandals called the Romans bad names. I'll bet the French called the Brits bad names at Waterloo. They used bad names and language in the Civil War, and WWI, and WWII, and Korea, and Vietnam, and the 1st Gulf War... it is the way it is. Harry gave em hell just like thousands of other soldiers in the field. Wonder what our enemies call us? This is PC crazy.... oh yes, and the tape never should have seen the light of day. That's what I think. Richard

Here's the ABC version of the story.

Royal Furor Continues Over Harry's Racial Remarks
Prince Issues Apology, but for Many That's Not Enough
Jan. 12, 2009 —

Racially charged comments from Britain's Prince Harry that were captured on video while he was in the military are creating an explosive backlash in Britain, with lawmakers and Muslim groups condemning the 24-year-old's language.

While filming a video diary during his military training, Harry turned the camera on a fellow solder and said, "There he is, our little Paki friend."

"Paki" is a derogatory term used to describe South Asian immigrants in England.

David Cameron, Britain's opposition Conservative Party leader, said Harry's comments undermined work to root out racism from the country's armed forces.

"It is obviously a completely unacceptable thing to say," Cameron told the BBC.

The News of the World newspaper released the tape this weekend, reporting that Harry had made the remarks in 2006 during a visit to Cyprus to carry out training exercises with fellow military cadets.

One Pakistani man in London who did not give his name said it was "disgusting."

"If the royals are thinking about us in this way, then I'm sure other people are going to think the same," he said.

Harry has been in trouble before with alcohol, drugs and fistfights, and he's been called a racist after he dressed as a Nazi for a costume party in 2005.

But many in Britain believe this latest royal blunder is by far the worst. One London tabloid headline this morning read, "Sorry's Not Good Enough."

"The monarchy, as an institution, is here to unify the country, that's what they say their job is. But this, far from unifying the nation, is actually dangerous, I think," said Robert Jobson, a News of the World editor.

The prince's handlers offered an apology and an explanation Saturday.

"Prince Harry fully understands how offensive this term can be and is extremely sorry for any offense his words might cause," spokesman Patrick Harrison said in a statement.

"However, on this occasion three years ago, Prince Harry used the term without any malice and as a nickname about a highly popular member of his platoon. There is no question that Prince Harry was in any way seeking to insult his friend."

Harry was also caught on tape telling another cadet, "You look like a raghead." "Raghead" is a derogatory term for Arabs.

Harrison said that Harry had used the term "raghead" to refer to either the Taliban or Iraqi insurgents.

Harry's language "is sickening, and he should be thoroughly ashamed of himself," said Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Ramadan Foundation, a British Muslim youth organization.

Royals' Scandalous Past
The prince also pretended he was on the phone with his grandmother Queen Elizabeth and grandfather Prince Phillip.

He said jokingly, "And Grandpa. Ya, ya, God save you."

Prince Phillip is no stranger to the racial slur.

"Prince Philip has certainly made some unfortunate remarks over the years. He called the Chinese 'slitty-eyed,'" said Ingrid Seward, editor in chief of Majesty Magazine.

He's also insulted Romanians, Kenyans, Indians and Canadians.

"Perhaps neither of them remember that people are listening and cameras are on them," Seward said.

"Harry isn't particularly bright and is probably unable to weigh up what he can do and what he can't do and what he can say and what he can't say," Seward said.

British historian Robert Lacey said Harry will survive the uproar and compared his remarks to past royal scandals.

"In the grand scheme of things, I think they will have forgotten it by next week," Lacey told "Good Morning America Weekend." "Sixteen, 17 years ago we were pondering over the fact that his father had been caught on the telephone talking to his mistress saying that he wanted to be a tampon inside her. We heard about his mother talking to lovers on the telephone. I think this is all part of what we rather enjoy in Britain about the royal family."

Third in line to the British throne, Harry may have "spare heir" syndrome, according to Lacey.

"The queen had a younger sister Princess Margaret who was known to drink too much, who had a toy-boy boyfriend," Lacey said. "It's part of how you live with an iconic family. You've got to have that black sheep, and Harry certainly lives up to that."

The Associated Press contributed to this article.

Copyright © 2009 ABC News Internet Ventures


John said...

Agreed. The way soldiers talk to each other is private and no matter who the soldier is he or she is entitled to that expression without being held up to scorn.

betsmeier said...

I agree Richard. I don't think that a private conversation between soldiers should be broadcast all over the world. Just because he's a Prince doesn't mean he isn't human. And besides military people talk to each other like that.